Selected Scientific Papers
Increasing pressure on freshwater resources due to terrestrial feed ingredients for aquaculture production
Terrestrial alternatives for fish meal and fish oil increase the water footprint and economic water productivity may be reduced due to alternative feed formulations, warns new study.
As aquaculture becomes more important for feeding the growing world population, so too do the required natural resources needed to produce aquaculture feed. While there is potential to replace fish meal and fish oil with terrestrial feed ingredients, it is important to understand both the positive and negative implications of such a development.
The use of feed with a large proportion of terrestrial feed may reduce the pressure on fisheries to provide feed for fish, but at the same time it may significantly increase the pressure on freshwater resources, due to water consumption and pollution in crop production for aquafeed.
In this study, the green, blue and grey water footprint of cultured fish and crustaceans related to the production of commercial feed for the year 2008 has been determined for the major farmed species, representing 88% of total fed production. The green, blue and grey production-weighted average feed water footprints of fish and crustaceans fed commercial aquafeed are estimated at 1629 m3/t, 179 m3/t and 166 m3/t, respectively. The estimated global total water footprint of commercial aquafeed was 31–35 km3 in 2008.
The top five contributors to the total water footprint of commercial feed are Nile tilapia, grass carp, whiteleg shrimp, common carp and Atlantic salmon, which together have a water footprint of 18.2 km3.
An analysis of alternative diets revealed that the replacement of fish meal and fish oil with terrestrial feed ingredients may further increase pressure on freshwater resources. At the same time economic consumptive water productivity may be reduced, especially for carnivorous species.
The results show that for the aquaculture sector to grow sustainably, freshwater consumption and pollution due to aquafeed need to be taken into account.
Authors: M. Pahlow, P.R. van Oel, M.M. Mekonnen, A.Y. Hoekstra
Science of The Total Environment: Volume 536, 1 December 2015, Pages 847–857.
Read the full open access paper here.